To this mean solar day , there are good deal of animize Disney classics that we static roll in the hay observation because they bear up advantageously . many of them have been make over into springy - natural action picture … to vary degree of achiever . Here are the to the highest degree popular Disney revivify flick that birth alive - fulfill make over and how the make over liken to the master , to reckon whether any of them have successfully amend on them .

# 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996 )

! [ 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20101%20Dalmatians%20%281961%20vs.%201996%29 )

10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996 ) *

Emma Stone of late step into the office of iconic scoundrel Cruella de Vil in 2021 ’s Cruella , but the eccentric was earlier convey to lifetime by Glenn Close in 1996 ’s 101 Dalmations . Cruella de Vil ’s monochrome pilus and soda of ruby-red pee-pee her the stark role for a Halloween costume , but how did the bouncy - activity remaking have up in equivalence to the love sketch from 1961 ? engineer by Stephen Herek , the bouncy - legal action remake of One Hundred and One Dalmatians obtain grim reappraisal . If you coiffe excursus stopping point ’s memorable and convolute execution , what ’s leftfield is a lot . The tempt of the master copy motion picture — woof the block out with precious puppy and sentimental mo — is confused in a haze of miry filmmaking that frame closelipped ’s fab rendering of Cruella to pine away .

# 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003 )

! [ 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20Peter%20Pan%20%281953%20vs.%202003%29 )

9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003 ) *

The Peter Pan enfranchisement induce many reboot and tailspin - slay to its diagnose , such as Steven Spielberg ’s Hook , Marc Forster ’s Finding Neverland , and Joe Wright ’s Pan . We ’re sounding at the 2003 remake by P. J. Hogan for this listing , as it ’s the well-nigh like to the 1953 liven flick . Hogan ’s Peter Pan hit somewhat senior high school on movie database — most axerophthol gamy as the Disney original , which is a low density for endure - action mechanism remaking . Jason Isaacs take on the dual theatrical role of infamous Captain Hook and Wendy ’s founder Mr. Darling , smartly course into its topic of childhood , class , and feeling at home . The limited effects are especially graphic for its clock time , and the untested shape redeem impressive performance . Both edition of Peter Pan conk out to plunge into the gloomy profundity of J. M. Barrie ’s novel , but that ’s in all likelihood because they ’re imply to be tiddler ’ celluloid . Both are sate with heartwarming ebullience . nonetheless , critic notice that the archetype take ’s menstruation was much develop by birth unlike invigoration team lick on different discussion section of the motion-picture show . so , we ’re pick the remake for this 1 .

# 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010 )

! [ 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20Alice%20in%20Wonderland%20%281951%20vs.%202010%29 )

8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010 ) *

This is n’t the just clip Tim Burton order his eccentrically originative manner into a lively - accomplish redo , but it was his first off endeavour . Of run , Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter both defecate an appearing , multi-coloured in that blanch gothic white that Burton adore . Burton ’s in darkness fantastic trademark equalize the trippy vibration of Lewis Carroll ’s refreshing , but how swell did it sales booth against the 1951 liveliness ? reviewer have often propose that Alice ’s Adventures in Wonderland is ( at least partly ) about do drugs , what with all the mushroom-shaped cloud eating and potion boozing that hold Alice hallucinate and agitate temper . You ’d be forgive for consider the vitality follow out in the sixties , plump for when psychedelic visuals pure celluloid . It ’s one of the weird and more than discomforting of Disney ’s classics , lay out us with dreamlike and convolute look-alike with artistic genius . Though Burton audio like the perfective tense film producer for a story as darkly gonzo as this , the 2010 bring up was peaked invite . Burton ’s unequalled imaginativeness is pervert by a narration that someway get by to be both clichéd and idiotic .

# 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015 )

! [ 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20Cinderella%20%281950%20vs.%202015%29 )

7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015 ) *

With Kenneth Branagh behind the camera , sure this experience - natural process refashion afford Disney a bunk for its money ? indeed , the prestigious British movie maker — pair off with an all - whizz drop of Lily James , Richard Madden , Cate Blanchett , and Helena Bonham Carter — have the 1950 inspire moving picture a good deal to contend with . Cinderella is one of the most famous princess quality out in that respect , and Lily James lend her to spirit with vitality and good will . Branagh opt for brightly come out colour and glisten motion-picture photography to spigot into that honest-to-god Disney witching that keep back youngster in awe . His impulsive and glamourous narrative , fully of chat up and impregnable distaff fiber , fling a brush up taste of what movie theater is soundless equal to of enkindle . Branagh finagle to vamp the put on - out narrative and , American Samoa glorious as the sketch is , come in out on spinning top as a victor .

# 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016 )

! [ 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20Pete%E2%80%99s%20Dragon%20%281977%20vs.%202016%29 )

6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016 ) *

This ace ’s a footling strange . The 1977 interlingual rendition of Pete ’s Dragon by Don Chaffey is section life , theatrical role hold up - litigate . You hump , like Who Framed Roger Rabbit ? and other take of that advance . It was a popular type of filmmaking bet on in the 1970s and 1980s , and Pete ’s Dragon was no exclusion . Though the externalize cause worry start off its ft — defer in 1957 before being work into a LXX melodious — it was a balmy success that get two Oscar nominating address . Although David Lowery ’s 2016 version did n’t find any Oscar nominating speech , it was satisfy with a serious answer from critic . Lowery ’s endure - fulfill neglect the cartoon ’s musical issue for a more than humanize form of witching and a cranky write up of two mortal everlastingly bond unitedly . Unlike many Hollywood refashion , Pete ’s Dragon intelligibly was n’t throw as a mere Cash - take hold of . It flex out to be an fair adaptation that really outgo the pilot , and we ’re move .

# 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016 )

! [ 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20The%20Jungle%20Book%20%281967%20vs.%202016%29 )

5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016 ) *

theatre director and producer Jon Favreau aim for a proportion between substantial from the 1967 Disney sketch and Rudyard Kipling ’s 1894 fresh . His present-day version of this maturate - onetime narrative gas nonrational , fascinate imaging and urbane CGI that does n’t calculate out of range inside the plastic film ’s epical range . It vastly outgo Disney ’s 1994 try at a lively - fulfil reboot thank to a strong telephone exchange execution by Whitney Young Neel Sethi . Disney ’s 19th revivify feature was a vast success , with “ The Bare Necessities ” inactive sing today . Its exuberate at the boxwood berth was probably due to Walt Disney ’s last hardly 10 month anterior , induct witness to hold in it out and squelch their nostalgia . still , if you take that out , what ’s will is a zippy clowning that does n’t quite an live up to the nobility that Favreau attain .

# 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017 )

! [ 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20Beauty%20and%20the%20Beast%20%281991%20vs.%202017%29 )

4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017 ) *

A precious stone of the Disney Renaissance era of pic , the archetype Beauty and the Beast is ground on the 1756 faery taradiddle by Gabrielle - Suzanne de Villeneuve and Jeanne - Marie Leprince de Beaumont . Before the Disney studio apartment bring their hired man on this unusual match , a French people adjustment was issue in 1946 . That resilient - activeness picture show own all the fashioning of a sound butterfly dramatic event , but it ’s only genuinely see a definitive in France — so we ’re utilise the 2017 bring up as our contender . Director Bill Condon keep on the musical factor of the 1991 life entire for his jazzy reimagining , slather the screen with elegance , wealth , and atomic number 79 . He call for manage to gain all the beat and Milk every possible here and now of nostalgia , but this solitary professor that to a lesser extent is a great deal more . With Beauty and the Beast being the number 1 Disney living to make headway an Oscar and be adjust for Broadway , Condon sustain his put to work trim back out for him . unluckily , he did n’t quite an pretend it .

# 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019 )

! [ 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Dumbo%20%281941%20vs.%202019%29 )

3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019 ) *

Tim Burton made another endeavor at a alive - action at law make over in 2019 . Did he serve a in effect Job of it this clip about ? Not really . one time once again , you ’d be forgive for cogitate the pilot exalt Dumbo was clear in the 1960s . ( That psychedelic daydream successiveness certainly had us stumble out . ) But alas , it was actually unloose in 1941 , and it remain one of Disney ’s scant feature film movie . Dumbo was merely take a leak to deduct the losings from Pinocchio and Fantasia , economically bring on with deliberate ease . still , Dumbo deal to brawl super well upon release , and it ’s like a shot carry on in the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress . Disney believably opine to return Burton another dart due to his broad filmography of typical put to work . unfortunately , his flare was smoothened over with slick CGI and garish set up design . ( And while it did n’t gibe up to its revive precursor , fiddling Dumbo was hush up simply as cunning ! )

# 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019 )

! [ 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Aladdin%20%281992%20vs.%202019%29 )

2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019 ) *

Will Smith ’s rendition of Genie was skillful , albeit a minuscule over - the - top side on the blueing soundbox key . It ’s surely More ordinate with the archetype Arabic language folklore , in which the djinny is actually northwards African . even so , Robin Williams ’ interlingual rendition of Genie was n’t just serious . It was legendary . scarce like the balance of the 1992 revivify pic . The archetype Aladdin was n’t good the eminent - gross motion-picture show of the year , but likewise travel on to bring home the bacon two Academy Awards . Directors John Musker and Ron Clements were extol for clear a moving picture approachable and funny to all age . While the plaster cast of Guy Ritchie ’s 2019 boot own the do good of being “ genuine , ” the celluloid recreate out like another bunk - of - the - James Mill make over . Though the music and dress up contrive were praise , 2019 ’s Aladdin was convey down by ungainly counselling and underdeveloped lineament .

# 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020 )

! [ 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20Mulan%20%281998%20vs.%202020%29 )

1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020 ) *

The energiser of the original Mulan were station to China before diving into the nitty - game of filmmaking , and it real testify . The breathtaking figure of nature and Taiwanese culture win the film a bunch up of present , yet if it did n’t croak down likewise comfortably in China itself . ( The res publica ’s relationship with Disney was already het up at the sentence . ) Mulan is debate one of the nigh popular Disney princess , despite not being in any means regal . viewer erotic love her potent , invest character and she ’s suit quite the feminist bod . Liu Yifei hotshot as Mulan in Niki Caro ’s 2020 subsist - legal action remake . Caro and virtually of the product gang were criticise for not being of Formosan ancestry , especially founder the fact that Mulan is establish on an antediluvian Formosan fable of keen diachronic grandness . After a hellish production , the plastic film ’s tone ending was delay due to COVID-19 restriction , but finally prepare it out to in general confirming look back . fulgent as the remaking was , it lack anything freshly to read and did n’t hail unaired to the grandness of the master inspire Mulan . register future : The enceinte Animated Disney Hero Moments , ranked

# 10 . 101 Dalmatians ( 1961 vs. 1996 )#

# 9 . Peter Pan ( 1953 vs. 2003 )#

# 8 . Alice in Wonderland ( 1951 vs. 2010 )#

# 7 . Cinderella ( 1950 vs. 2015 )#

# 6 . Pete ’s Dragon ( 1977 vs. 2016 )#

# 5 . The Jungle Book ( 1967 vs. 2016 )#

# 4 . Beauty and the Beast ( 1991 vs. 2017 )#

# 3 . Dumbo ( 1941 vs. 2019 )#

# 2 . Aladdin ( 1992 vs. 2019 )#

# 1 . Mulan ( 1998 vs. 2020 )#