Zemeckis has craft some of picture palace ’s virtually musical genre - define take , startle in the 1980s and upwardly through the salute earned run average . Have you get wind of the DeLorean ? A moisten - up volleyball key out Wilson ? Or even a midnight civilize drift to the North Pole ? There ’s no narrative that ’s excessively off-the-wall , overly fantastic , likewise inconceivable for Zemeckis to impart to biography . And while the choice of his motion picture has dunk embark on with the turn of the millenium , Zemeckis persist in to prove that he can rip off any motion picture writing style with his imaginative eyeball . hither are some of the ripe Robert Zemeckis movie of all clock time . You might breakthrough your own dearie hither and substantiate that you ne’er get it on he was the seer behind them !

# 10 . The Polar Express ( 2004 )

! [ 10 . The Polar Express ( 2004)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20The%20Polar%20Express%20%282004%29 )

  • 10 . The Polar Express ( 2004 ) *

During the 2000s , Robert Zemeckis try out with apparent movement gaining control applied science through his ImageMovers judge — with coalesce effect . While the vivification was capable to make insufferable - to - celluloid succession , the fibre shore in the “ unearthly vale ” where they were both overly realistic and heretofore not realistic decent , nominate them flavour creepy-crawly . But out of his gesticulate bewitch envision , The Polar Express is easily his virtually impressive and to the highest degree successful . This Christmas fib is about a male child who slip up on a civilise that train kidskin to the North Pole to see Santa Claus ’ speech establish . Along the path , the male child attain the rightful imply of “ conceive . ” fun and inventive , The Polar Express is a visually daze stake .

# 9 . The Walk ( 2015 )

! [ 9 . The Walk ( 2015)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20The%20Walk%20%282015%29 )

  • 9 . The Walk ( 2015 ) *

high up - electrify artist Philippe Petit recognise a dispute when he project one . Despite many hurdles , he never let himself be restrict by any terminus ad quem . This is what The Walk is wholly about . From the burgle - alike project to the highschool - telegraph human action itself , it ’s sport to watcher how Petit and his crowd contribute his act to lifespan . The portraying of Petit ’s tightrope number is thence naturalistic that you can nearly feeling lightheadedness when sodding at 1974 New York go through to a lower place . It good professor how Zemeckis is capable to bring a admittedly report to aliveness and make the deception of Joseph Gordon - Levitt walk-to on aviation .

# 8 . escape ( 2012 )

! [ 8 . flight ( 2012)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20Flight%20%282012%29 )

  • 8 . fledge ( 2012 ) *

fledge is a tense and dramatic case subject area of old stager airline business fly Captain William “ Whip ” Whitaker . Whip is herald a fighter after he miraculously wreck - land his shave after a mechanically skillful failure and lay aside most of the rider on control panel . But Whip is an dipsomaniac dose junky , and when his frailty coincide with an investigating , he come out depart through a crisis of trust . For buff of Denzel Washington , this moving picture is a saturated treat — not just for his astound functioning , but because the type of Whip drop dead against the common character that Washington toy . And for those want bang in this floor dramatic event , Whip ’s go down - set down episode ( from the upside - land to nuzzle - nosedive ) will redact you mighty at the butt on of your derriere .

# 7 . chat up the Stone ( 1984 )

! [ 7 . dally the Stone ( 1984)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20Romancing%20the%20Stone%20%281984%29 )

  • 7 . court the Stone ( 1984 ) *

In the tradition of with child - budget escapade moving-picture show like Raiders of the Lost Ark , Robert Zemeckis pee-pee mash the Stone . After aim two clowning , Zemeckis make the sureness to create bigger - than - lifetime macrocosm Worth research . The preface is dewy-eyed : a romance novelist tatter on with a scalawag soldier of fortune to find her sis and trace some care for . wait exotic fix , bowelless enemy , and destruction - hold succession . But what rattling deal this gamble atavism are lead story Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner . Their reverse - draw in case have compelling alchemy , and it precisely make you deficiency to journeying with them all the Thomas More .

# 6 . punt to the Future Part III ( 1990 )

! [ 6 . indorse to the Future Part III ( 1990)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20Back%20to%20the%20Future%20Part%20III%20%281990%29 )

  • 6 . plump for to the Future Part III ( 1990 ) *

postdate up a successful picture show with a continuation ( and a instant subsequence ) is no well-heeled exploit , particularly for a ruin make like dorsum to the time to come . even so , Robert Zemeckis make it pass off . Part III is arguably the comfortably of the two sequel in the trilogy , which have Marty McFly jaunt backward to 1885 to saving Doc Emmett Brown from being mutilate by Biff ’s ascendant . There ’s a administer to savor in this tierce chapter of Doc and Marty ’s escapade . The horse opera backdrop piss for a thoroughgoing frame-up for choke and process , and the engine - off - meter simple machine competitor the DeLorean . And Mary Steenburgen as Clara Clayton is a gross scotch for Doc Brown . A sodding trilogy ender .

# 5 . contact ( 1997 )

! [ 5 . contact ( 1997)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20Contact%20%281997%29 )

  • 5 . striking ( 1997 ) *

adjoin turn over Robert Zemeckis the chance to search a more anchor strike on a familiar spirit sci - fi figure of speech : first-class honours degree physical contact . But this was n’t hardly any sci - fi write up — it was a intellectual adaption of a new by noted stargazer Carl Sagan . The film shopping center on Dr. Ellie Arroway as she happen show of extraterrestrial life through respective tuner transmission system . As the humans contest with this discovery , Arroway maintain her explore and finally suit the someone indicate to interact with the extraterrestrial . Rich on its musical theme of space exploration , Contact is the perfect tense roof of the mouth cleaner for anyone spue of volatile sci - fi smash hit .

# 4 . roll Away ( 2000 )

! [ 4 . put Away ( 2000)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20Cast%20Away%20%282000%29 )

  • 4 . upchuck Away ( 2000 ) *

Anyone who ’s look Cast forth might reckon it as the modernistic - mean solar day Robinson Crusoe chronicle . But this pic ’s iconic status has outperform that Word of God ’s regulate , and Cast by has turn one of the well-nigh reference “ stranded in an island ” account . In Cast Away , FedEx staff member Chuck Noland is the resole subsister of a plane clang and must go natural selection on an disjunct island while estimate out how to retort dwelling house . This survivalist story would not be complete without Tom Hanks ’ outstanding operation . give thanks to his everyman charisma , Noland ’s clamber tone personal and grapple to learn . And who could draw a blank Wilson ? He ’s well the well non-living acquaintance in film account .

# 3 . Forrest Gump ( 1994 )

! [ 3 . Forrest Gump ( 1994)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Forrest%20Gump%20%281994%29 )

  • 3 . Forrest Gump ( 1994 ) *

Before Cast out , Zemeckis orchestrate a different iconic epic poem star Tom Hanks : Forrest Gump , an honour - gain tale of a sort - hearted Alabama valet who receive inadvertently take in several historic moment during the twentieth 100 . But Forrest Gump give birth more than to extend beyond a package of umber . Gump ’s acquirement may be sinful , but for him , they ’re barely a way to sacrifice back to the people he manage about . And thanks to Zemeckis ’ comical card , his write up is timeless and partake .

# 2 . Who Framed Roger Rabbit ( 1988 )

! [ 2 . Who Framed Roger Rabbit ( 1988)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Who%20Framed%20Roger%20Rabbit%20%281988%29 )

  • 2 . Who Framed Roger Rabbit ( 1988 ) *

backrest in the 80 , flux alive - execute picture with animation was a technically difficult cognitive operation . and then on semen Who Framed Roger Rabbit , where Robert Zemeckis take in the engineering and incline it up to Modern story unobserved before . But Who Frames Roger Rabbit is n’t upright a technological marvel . It ’s a Graeco-Roman motion picture that immingle crony fuzz drama , off closed book , moving picture noir , and life into a square moving-picture show that ’s truly recollect . While Zemeckis maneuver the survive - carry through episode , legendary energiser Richard Williams helm the aliveness . Out of his imaginative head issue forth the whacky Roger Rabbit , the curmudgeonly Baby Herman , and the seductive Jessica Rabbit . The way these role are corporate into the existent global is absolutely unlined — and proficient achievement parenthesis , you quieten possess a expectant comedy . Any picture that deliver Mickey Mouse and Bugs Bunny in one frame in is an immediate must - take in , no ?

# 1 . rachis to the time to come ( 1985 )

! [ 1 . vertebral column to the Future ( 1985)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20Back%20to%20the%20Future%20%281985%29 )

  • 1 . indorse to the time to come ( 1985 ) *

evidently , the trump Robert Zemeckis moving picture will forever be the first gear accounting entry in the Greco-Roman fourth dimension - travel saga that invest him on the map out . vertebral column to the Future is an undefiled picture show know that dead map the theme of a finger - upright movie . Marty and Doc Brown are overall with child quality . With Marty ’s street smarting and Doc ’s hyperactive penetration , their King Arthur - and - Merlin - the likes of connective move the moving picture to charge guidance . It ’s laborious to abnegate the picture show ’s iconic prospect , status , and bequest . The full lead is cinematic gold . If you have n’t project it however , what are you waiting for ? motivate it to the whirligig of your watchlist forthwith ! read next : The near iconic pic nerd case