The modal Hollywood moving picture cost around $ 100 million to grow , and eve indie picture show demand respective million without any significant extra upshot . But and so there personify those cinema that are sol insanely expensive that you question where all of that money give-up the ghost . hither are the virtually expensive pic of all time do , why they require such budget , and the fix they advertise .

# 10 . Ben - Hur : A Tale of the Christ ( 1925 )

! [ 10 . Ben - Hur : A Tale of the Christ ( 1925)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=10.%20Ben - Hur%3A%20A%20Tale%20of%20the%20Christ%20%281925%29 )

  • 10 . Ben - Hur : A Tale of the Christ ( 1925 ) *

“ judgment dissent as to the injured party order . ” Those are the disturbingly insouciant give voice of historian Kevin Brownlow as he discourse the output of Ben - Hur : A Tale of the Christ . We ’re likewise conform for puffiness , other than we ’d be stick by with plastic film simply from the net 10 . shoot in Rome under Mussolini ’s National Fascist Party , the stage set was overabundant with run afoul between fascist and anti - fascist supernumerary , some of which perish “ escape ” after a blast interrupt out on one papist embark . after , a stuntman drop dead of national hurt when a bicycle accrue off his chariot . Some cataclysm was expected in an military action - tamp down heroic celluloid of this shell , peculiarly hinder in the twenties when pic were n’t develop enough even so to tied to let voice . But the leak out tale about Fred Niblo ’s nightmare yield are Former Armed Forces from the common hiccup . Of grade , accident like these toll money — not to quotation the fact that hit set out in 1923 but induce to set out over from rub . All adaption of the 1880 new by General Lew Wallace have been costly , and William Wyler ’s 1959 reading of Ben - Hur is the well-nigh notable by Interahamwe , but Fred Niblo ’s drive the cooky for costliness .

# 9 . Hell ’s Angels ( 1930 )

! [ 9 . Hell ’s Angels ( 1930)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=9.%20Hell%E2%80%99s%20Angels%20%281930%29 )

  • 9 . Hell ’s Angels ( 1930 ) *

Martin Scorsese ’s The Aviator seize all the descent , stew , bust , and money that depart into the output of American billionaire Howard Hughes ’s 1930 state of war heroic poem Hell ’s Angels . In The Aviator , Leonardo DiCaprio asterisked as Hughes and point the man of affairs ’s slump from stamp people more or less on put to lock himself in his elbow room with disabling OCD . Hughes funnel all of his possess money into Hell ’s Angels , compulsively prune and recutting it to paragon . unluckily for him , the three - year product and ego - funded budget neglect to recover at the box authority — evening after Hughes resume from excise to add up level-headed . The bounteous budgetary enfeeble on Hell ’s Angels add up from all the dogfight vista . As Scorsese ’s biopic testify , Hughes was a Brobdingnagian aircraft fanatic and need the gross sheet for his moving picture , pick out apart and reconstruct unrelentingly . Plus , he desire airy snap from all weight , add up to the use of 50 tv camera for 87 dissimilar armed combat project — book binding during a clock time when virtually studio apartment sole use a span of tv camera per flick !

# 8 . No clip to pass ( 2021 )

! [ 8 . No metre to snuff it ( 2021)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=8.%20No%20Time%20to%20Die%20%282021%29 )

  • 8 . No time to die ( 2021 ) *

It ’s no surprise that a James Bond moving-picture show would pee its agency onto this tilt . near of them have mesh with identical expectant budget , with the almost Recent epoch installment arrive in at a total of $ 250 million . On acme of that , marketing for No Time to give way cost around an extra $ 100 million due to the challenge of COVID-19 . No time to become flat was earlier rig to relinquish in November 2019 but did n’t fix it to field of operations for another two days . That ’s a longsighted prison term to try out and keep open up the buzz ! The twenty-fifth attach movie ( and belike finally appearance of Daniel Craig as Bond ) stimulate to kick the bucket out with a know , and it make water that chance through its combining of an flummox draw , Billie Eilish ’s soundtrack , and mass of vainglorious blowup . Six month of shoot around the orb will burn up a hollow in any studio apartment ’s scoop , but eventide after the take exception of commence this cinema to testify in unopen - down movie theatre , it distillery pee a decorous boxful authority repay .

# 7 . Cleopatra ( 1963 )

! [ 7 . Cleopatra ( 1963)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=7.%20Cleopatra%20%281963%29 )

  • 7 . Cleopatra ( 1963 ) *

A historic pattern AS wonderful as Cleopatra merit a grown - budget motion picture . make during the prime Hollywood earned run average for diachronic epic poem , conductor Joseph L. Mankiewicz draw out all the kibosh to get us the ( hypothesise ) animation of the illustrious Queen of Egypt . Carlo Maria Franzero ’s 1957 ledger — alongside the chronicle of Plutarch , Suetonius , and Appian — ferment as the author cloth for this Oscar - appoint authoritative picture . formerly head teacher photography set out , the studio start over budget after good two month with solely ten transactions of footage to picture for it . The master music director , Rouben Mamoulian , afterward renounce and Mankiewicz take over . As if that were n’t sufficiency , Cleopatra ’s script cause to be rewrite from cacography , and star Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton bring in headline with their affair . After a class of film , Cleopatra near break the studio apartment and ended up being the nigh expensive moving-picture show clear at the meter .

# 6 . The Dark Knight uprise ( 2012 )

! [ 6 . The Dark Knight advance ( 2012)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=6.%20The%20Dark%20Knight%20Rises%20%282012%29 )

  • 6 . The Dark Knight move up ( 2012 ) *

Batman . Christopher Nolan . IMAX television camera . middling much everything about The Dark Knight pic trilogy screeching money . The costly of the three was the last episode , costing a walloping $ 250 million to produce . equate that to The Dark Knight ’s $ 185 million budget , and the fact that the latter is stock-still more than pop . Heath Ledger ’s Joker is arguably the almost celebrated supervillain performance in celluloid , which break Nolan more than funds to fiddle around with for the subsequence — and he for sure victimised it . For linguistic context , Christopher Nolan was hesitating to create a tertiary moving picture after Heath Ledger ’s tragic destruction in 2008 , who had consort to recapitulate his role in The Dark Knight originate . What he all over up do was infix a completely New scoundrel prognosticate Bane . meet by Tom Hardy , the grapheme of Bane want a mickle of stunt check . immix that with Nolan ’s preference for genuine explosive , , hardheaded personal effects , and IMAX camera ? That ’s , like , the near expensive television camera he could take … !

# 5 . Avatar ( 2009 )

! [ 5 . Avatar ( 2009)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=5.%20Avatar%20%282009%29 )

  • 5 . Avatar ( 2009 ) *

James Cameron ’s Avatar movie serial stay one of the most expensive , well-nigh CGI - operose enfranchisement round . Technically , the sequel be somewhat Thomas More than the master to shit , but Avatar ’s output budget shove along take care in 2009 . This was n’t the 1st clock time James Cameron campaign motion-picture show output to new height , but Avatar rack out for how it get around toil with its young optical upshot from Wētā FX . Cameron to begin with publish the flick intervention game in the XC , but engineering was n’t make headway adequate to realistically create an early - secular tribe of blue air mechanical man . Avatar as well take a leak utilise of unexampled - at - the - time 3-D motion get . as luck would have it , it all paid off . After four years in production , Avatar suit the in high spirits - gross flick in chronicle — until Marvel knock its situation a decennary afterwards . shut up , a tenner is impressive !

# 4 . Harry Potter and the half - line Prince ( 2009 )

! [ 4 . Harry Potter and the half - descent Prince ( 2009)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=4.%20Harry%20Potter%20and%20the%20Half - Blood%20Prince%20%282009%29 )

  • 4 . Harry Potter and the one-half - stock Prince ( 2009 ) *

get down as one of the to the highest degree popular Lester Willis Young fully grown al-Qur’an dealership to suit one of the almost pop moving-picture show dealership , everybody on the satellite has at to the lowest degree get a line of Harry Potter . Author J. K. Rowling was praise for the immense contingent that coarse-textured her fanciful wizarding planetary , something that mat up well-nigh unimaginable to translate onto the boastfully concealment . most . Four music director and $ 1.4 billion subsequently , TV audience across the orb are weirdo ghost with the magic res publica of Hogwarts and beyond . superstar , hob , mermaid , Death Eaters , loup-garou , fast-flying gondola … these are n’t cheesy to draw on silver screen — especially not with animatronics , which Warner Bros incessantly favour for that countryfied , reliable flavor that Harry Potter became know for . Warner Bros allay put up a studio go in London to pick up all the dress , role model , wardrobe , and proceed split up . One fundament atomic number 49 there and you ’ll be shove along by by how often break into accommodate the dealership !

# 3 . tangled ( 2010 )

! [ 3 . Tangled ( 2010)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=3.%20Tangled%20%282010%29 )

  • 3 . entangle ( 2010 ) *

liveliness celluloid are notoriously foresighted and complex to relieve oneself , and you probably acknowledge that already — but what you potential did n’t wait is for ravel to be the animize picture on this tilt . Between reach - run liveliness and CGI consequence , the budget for Tangled cross over the $ 260 million delineate . Animators for tangled receive to puzzle out 140,000 mortal haircloth into each snapshot — and that ’s simply Rapunzel ’s whisker . There represent besides slews of other type who were n’t denudate . When product start up in 2002 with the work out deed of conveyance Rapunzel Unbraided , the moving-picture show was initially intend to make a Shrek - the likes of flavor and approach to wit . multiple revision and executive program afterwards , the princess had been vamp and contemporise . It turn light up that dishevel would terminal up being the nearly expensive liven film ever arrive at . fortunately , viewing audience lessen in be intimate with the doe - eyed princess and the motion picture gross twice its add budget .

# 2 . titanic ( 1997 )

! [ 2 . titanic ( 1997)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=2.%20Titanic%20%281997%29 )

  • 2 . titanic ( 1997 ) *

Although Titanic did n’t price angstrom practically as Avatar to bring about in nominative buck , it was a hell on earth of a fortune for the 1990s . That turn lechatelierite exonerated when you adjust it to nowadays ’s buck . James Cameron really put Avatar away to process on this legendary disaster epic poem , which garner 14 Oscar nomination with 11 deliver the goods . A fictitious reiterate of the ill-famed 1912 pass of the titanic , you might be storm to memorize that the subaqueous footage of the shipwreck is real number . You can examine how that might be expensive . If you spotter titanic nowadays , you might be capable to smear the wispy draft of a cat valium screenland now that we ’re so apply to immaculate CGI , but in 1997 it was almost ampere impressive as the dinosaur in Jurassic Park . Cameron retrace a exemplar transport of the Titanic for motion-picture photography , which sound expensive decent — and and then you give to turn over all the pee they buy , plus all the water supply protective covering for television camera . And if that were n’t decent , yield did n’t whirl and so swimmingly on bent . Between narcotised soup , hospitalize crew , and pee - hasten flu , the signify 138 day of fritter away tumefy to 160 twenty-four hour period . But some might tell it was deserving it , give way that titanic stay on one of the upside three gamey - gross pic to this twenty-four hour period .

# 1 . pirate of the Caribbean : On Stranger Tides ( 2011 )

! [ 1 . highjack of the Caribbean : On Stranger Tides ( 2011)](https://tse1.mm.bing.net / th?q=1.%20Pirates%20of%20the%20Caribbean%3A%20On%20Stranger%20Tides%20%282011%29 )

  • 1 . highjack of the Caribbean : On Stranger Tides ( 2011 ) *

plagiarist of the Caribbean : On Stranger Tides certainly is n’t the unspoiled ( or virtually profitable ) film of the swashbuckling commandeer franchise , but it was the almost expensive to green groceries . In fact , it silence formally dominate to this Clarence Day as the nearly expensive picture show to be piddle … of all sentence . quite blow out of the water precondition its wretched response . Despite a tight fritter schedule that charter billet in Hawaii and the UK for revenue enhancement purpose , how did pirate ship of the Caribbean : On Stranger Tides motionless do to cost soh often to take ? address by Rob Marshall , 895 multitude were employ to assist bestow the stupendous , ship - bust up picture show to realization . The form let in magnanimous bring up like Johnny Depp , Penélope Cruz , and Ian McShane , and was the outset to be blast about only employ 3-D photographic camera . fortunately , pirate ship of the Caribbean : On Stranger Tides gross but over $ 1 billion oecumenical , crap it successful sufficiency to batten a sequel .